Hillary Won But...

 February 4, 2023
 

Most of this writing comes from Larry's book:

LETTER to a DESPICABLE and DEPRAVED WOMAN
Hillary Clinton's Life of Deceit
The People's Choice for the Lifetime Bum's Rush Award
 ................

Hillary won the 2016 presidential election popular vote but.... 

She only won the battle, not the war.

The New York Times published detailed results of the 2016 election, results that tell all.1

Hillary Clinton has an appalling history of lying. Or, is it just her poor "I don't recall" memory? Either way, she isn't fit to preside over the United States of America.

During research for developing the above reference book, I was mildly surprised by the number of lies she told. I say mildly because I have know for years she is a liar not to be trusted. But I didn't know she is a big-time serial liar. 

She is, in my opinion, a troubled woman. Well-adjusted people do not use lies as a conduit for duping others.

Here are some excerpts, among many, from the book that I wrote about Hillary Clinton

November 8, 2016
The day United States voters, via the electoral college, gave you a strong message, a message that you are not welcome as our president. By putting you out to pasture, at least until 2020, voters prevented husband Slick Willie from becoming an immediate de facto president. Voters also delayed the country’s blossoming into full blown American Socialism due to the growing infestation of costly liberal social programs you would certainly bring with you. 

Electoral College
Twenty years ago, you were harping about doing away with the electoral college. Without much of an explanation of how the direct vote would better serve the people of the United States, you pretty much said in various interviews: I think it [the electoral college] needs to be eliminated. I'd like to see us move beyond it.

Well, yeah. My guess is that every loser of any endeavor would vote for rule changes. Hey, let us declare the best NBA team to be the team that takes the most shots, not the team that scores the most points. 

Red Jahncke makes these two points, among others, with respect to the argument:

The Electoral College was designed specifically to prevent the tyranny of big states over small states.

[With direct voting] Candidates would campaign in big media markets (which, of course, are in big states) in order to reach as many potential voters as efficiently as possible.

Ah, but here is Mr. Jahncke’s strongest assertion: Democrats should forget about changing the rules and start worrying about their performance.

 Point well taken? Huh?

Most Damaging Factor's 
I dare say the 1996 sniper incident, the 2012 Benghazi incident and your email fiasco were the most damaging of all factors contributing to your 2016 loss. Why? Because the media reminded us ad nauseam. How could we not know about those issues?

Allow me to explain.

Sniper Incident
My gosh, woman, what were you thinking? Were you running in fear of being shot dead? Were you talking to a local kid in a very leisurely way? Were you attempting to impress (read dupe) we the people of the United States? Or perhaps the very opinionated media was having fun with mind games. Reckon?

Whatever, this act alone strongly suggests you do not have the character expected by the people of the United States of America to preside over the country. I am appalled at the differences between your version of the event and the presumably accurate CNN report.

Here is an excerpt from CNN:

She said when she arrived in Bosnia on March 25, 1996, "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

But news video footage of her arrival at Tuzla shows Clinton, then the first lady, calmly walking from the rear ramp of a U.S. Air Force plane with her daughter, Chelsea, then 16, at her side. Both Clintons held their heads up and did not appear rushed.

The video shows Clinton spending several minutes talking with the group, including an 8-year-old Bosnian girl who presented her with a poem, and later greeting U.S. troops.

Clinton says she 'misspoke' about sniper fire
CNN Politics Election Center          March 25, 2008

Interesting reading, it is. Just as interesting is your quote from the same CNN report of what you claim you really meant to say:

Now let me tell you what I can remember, OK -- because what I was told was that we had to land a certain way and move quickly because of the threat of sniper fire. So I misspoke -- I didn't say that in my book or other times but if I said something that made it seem as though there was actual fire -- that's not what I was told. 

 

Whew! What a specimen of humanity you are.
 
Benghazi
You blew it big time with your tale about the September 11, 2012 attacks on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya.

You dutifully and disgracefully carried water for your boss and our “Father of Transparency” Barack Obama, a man who did not want voters to know within two months of the 2012 election he had an opportunity, (you know, before the happening), to save the lives of four of our citizens.

In the beginning, instead of telling the truth, you insisted well-organized terrorists did not plan the attack, but the attack was a reaction to an anti-Islam video.

 "We've seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with. It is hard for the American people to make sense of that because it is senseless, and it is totally unacceptable."

 However Representative Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) said this about your initial statements on Benghazi:

You can’t be square with the American people. You tell your family it’s a terrorist attack, but not the American people. You can tell the president of Libya it’s a terrorist attack, but not the American people. And you can tell the Egyptian prime minister it’s a terrorist attack, but you can’t tell your own people the truth.

Representative Jordan is not alone. An internet search will give numerous links to creditable articles exposing your lies about the Benghazi disaster.

Need more convincing evidence? Here it is – another excerpt from Mr. Murdock’s article:

At 11:12 p.m., just 40 minutes later, Hillary e-mailed her daughter, Chelsea, with the truth: “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group.” Hillary’s e-mail was addressed to “Diane Reynolds,” Chelsea’s code name. This smoking e-mail surfaced during Hillary’s October 22 hearing before the House Select Committee on Benghazi. 

 You are a real piece of work, dear Hillary.

Emails and Wikileaks
You surely know Federal law requires official business conducted by the Secretary of State’s office to be conducted with government equipment. While you served as our secretary of state, you used an email server in your home to send and receive emails regarding official business.

Knowledge of your private server became known to the public during the Benghazi hearings. You did not, of course, volunteer the information. Instead, you did what you do best. When cornered, you tried, but failed, to bluff your way out.

 According to a report from The New York Times:

In the end, the biggest revelation unearthed by the House special committee investigating the Benghazi attack came 15 months ago: the disclosure that Hillary Clinton had used a private email address and server during her four years as secretary of state.

Unscathed by Report, Hillary Clinton Faces Emails as Final Benghazi Chapter
 The New York Times   Mark Landler   Amy Chozick   June 28, 2016

 Do we have a serious matter here? Yes, it is serious. According to one FBI agent’s assertion:

Hillary Clinton could be prosecuted in federal court for failing to tell President Barack Obama about her private email server at the time she was running it, according to a veteran FBI agent.

 Investigation into Hillary's email server focuses on Espionage Act and could get her 10 years in jail as FBI agent says she could be prosecuted just for failing to tell Obama
Daily Mail     David Martosko     October 16, 2015

 Espionage Act? Ten years jail time? Sounds serious to me.

And we have the Wikileaks thing that does not help your image one bit. RT (formerly Russia Today) reported in its June 13, 2016 issue:

About 32,000 emails from her private server have been leaked by Wikileaks so far, but Assange would not confirm the number of emails or when they are expected to be published.

 Wikileaks will publish ‘enough evidence’ to indict Hillary Clinton, warns Assange
RT          June 13, 2016

Further, The Daily Caller stated when reporting another 20,000 email hacks on July 22, 2016:

It is unclear how Wikileaks obtained the records, but the release comes weeks after a hacker (or hackers) going by the name Guccifer 2.0 began releasing records obtained through the DNC’s computer systems. The hacker claims to be Romanian, but many suspect that the records were taken by a team of Russian hackers.
Wikileaks Releases Nearly 20,000 Hacked DNC Emails
The Daily Caller          Chuck Ross          July 22, 2016

Sure, the RT and Daily Caller reports give credibility to your campaign claims that Russia is responsible for retrieving your emails and using them to benefit Donald Trump.

Perhaps so but others say otherwise.

An August 1, 2016 Washington Examiner article states: 

A former National Security Agency analyst said it's possible that someone in the U.S. intelligence community leaked Hillary Clinton's emails to the public, since the NSA most likely has all of the messages Clinton deleted from her private email server.

Former NSA analyst: Clinton email leak may have come from the U.S.
Washington Examiner     Rudy Takala     August 1, 2016

Just days before Trump’s inauguration, WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange and Sean Hannity of Fox News had this exchange:

HANNITY: Can you say to the American people, unequivocally, that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta's emails, can you tell the American people 1,000 percent that you did not get it from Russia or anybody associated with Russia?

 

JULIAN ASSANGE: Yes. We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.

 Assange To Hannity: Source For WikiLeaks Was Not Russian Government
RealClear Politics          Ian Schwartz         January 2, 2017

 From the WikiLeaks website:

WikiLeaks is a multi-national media organization and associated library. It was founded by its publisher Julian Assange in 2006.

 

WikiLeaks specializes in the analysis and publication of large datasets of censored or otherwise restricted official materials involving war, spying and corruption. It has so far published more than 10 million documents and associated analyses.

You cannot convince any astute American that you did not know unsecured emails are easily obtained by enemies of the United States. While there are no clear answers in my mind as to whether you did or did not use a secured or unsecured server exclusively, WikiLeaks obtained at least some of your emails outside of official and authorized channels. With your reputation, I suspect most voters point the finger at you as a very negligent person.

Worse, and looking foolish, the FBI gave you a dubious pass after investigating the legality of your emails. Dubious pass? Surprised? You should not be surprised at all. Remember Slick Willie’s supposedly unplanned meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch (Comey’s boss) on the Phoenix airport tarmac?

An airport encounter this week between Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and former President Bill Clinton has welled into a political storm, with Republicans asserting that it compromised the Justice Department’s politically sensitive investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email practices while she was secretary of state.

  Meeting Between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch Provokes Political Furor
The New York Times Mark Landler June 30, 2016

In my mind, this email debacle just might reek of more barnyard stench than all your other stinky baggage incidents combined.

 _______________________________

_______________________________

End of selected excerpts from Larry's book:

 LETTER to a DESPICABLE and DEPRAVED WOMAN
Hillary Clinton's Life of Deceit
The People's Choice for the Lifetime Bum's Rush Award

 _______________________________

_______________________________

By the way, Hillary knows, or should know, all about these excerpts because I sent her a paperback copy of the book. Of course, I'll never know if she read the book or even got the book. If I were to ask her, I would expect her to not respond or respond with the short statement: I don't recall. 

She has a long history of duping others when it serves her purpose but she didn't dupe enough voters in 2016 to send her to Donald John Trump's Oval Office chair. 

If you believe in God, you should thank him for our good fortune.

I could go on and on but I'll stop now. Why, you ask? Because I might call her a disrespectful name that is insulting to female dogs. I don't want the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals disparaging me, you know.
 
💪
 
 1 2016 Presidential Election Results